Patient-centric Comparability Assessment of Biopharmaceuticals.

The comparability assessment of a biological product after implementing a manufacturing process change should involve a risk-based approach. Process changes may occur at any stage of the product lifecycle: early development, clinical manufacture for pivotal trials, or post-approval. The risk of the change to impact product quality varies. The design of the comparability assessment should be adapted accordingly. A working group reviewed and consolidated industry approaches to assess comparability of traditional protein-based biological products during clinical development and post-approval. The insights compiled in this review article encompass topics such as a risk-evaluation strategy, the design of comparability studies, definition of assessment criteria for comparability, holistic evaluation of data, and the regulatory submission strategy. These practices can be leveraged across the industry to help companies in design and execution of comparability assessments, and to inform discussions with global regulators.

A Risk- and Science-Based Approach to the Acceptance Sampling Plan Inspection of Protein Parenteral Products.

The requirement for visual inspection of pharmaceuticals has been a compendial expectation for over a century, with some advancement of visible particle control strategies in recent years. Current philosophies include a 100% inspection and an Acceptance Sampling Plan inspection. The particles found during these inspections are normally categorized simply by particle size (visible vs. subvisible), particle source (intrinsic vs. extrinsic) and particle type (inherent vs. extraneous). We believe that a more risk- and science-based approach is attainable, which is grounded in forensic data, toxicological/medical opinions and prior knowledge. We have provided an outline for how to determine patient safety impact of visible particles found in parenteral products and potential actions that could be taken within the quality system regarding lot disposition. We believe this approach focuses efforts on patient safety risks, enhances the use of prior knowledge and improves consistency in how particle observations are handled.